A lens are sharper in the middle, I suggest that you go to http://www Photodo.com MTF tests of lenses by Lars Kjellberg or read Norman Koren page http://www.normankoren.com/ Mikael Risedal >From: "Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X >Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 20:30:30 +0200 > >Steve writes: > > > But you do have the advantage that the centre is > > invariably sharper, often much sharper, than the edge. > >If that is such an advantage, why hasn't anyone designed lenses for 24x36 >that >cover a much larger area than the film frame? The same logic would apply. > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X shAf
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Paul Chefurka
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Robert Meier
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X bob geoghegan
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Tom Scales
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Steve Greenbank
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Mikael Risedal
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Shough, Dean
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Paul Chefurka
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Johnny Deadman
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Robert Meier
- RE: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Austin Franklin
- Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X Anthony Atkielski