David wrote If there's a way to effectively allocate more RAM to NikonScan (used as a plugin)...I'd be happy as a clam.
I wonder if Im missing something's here! The only thing you can do is: 1.Allocate more RAM memory to Photoshop if you are using NikonScan as a plugin and have a MAC computer. Give Photoshop at least 800Mb of your 1.5 Gb RAAM memory 2. If you are using NikonScan alone allocate 600Mb RAAM memory of your 1.5 Gb RAAM memory 3 There are no problem to allocate more RAAM memory to a software, if you dont know how to do it : read the help function in your MAC. Mikael Risedal -- >From: "david/lisa soderman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED nightmares!!! >Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:39:30 -0600 > > > Let me ask why did you buy the Nikon LS8000 if you recognised that it >had > > problems with the banding? > > > > I ask - as I was considering both the SS120 and the LS8000. > >ICE was an important factor for me. The new Minolta Scan Multi Pro was not >shipping at the time. Others have claimed to *not* experience the banding >problem with the LS8000. > >Looking back, it was a risk that doesn't seem to be working out very well >at >this point. I have to admit though that I have *not* experienced any >banding so far. I have had an old mounted slide be killer out of focus due >to shallow d.o.f.. The main problem is slow speed and horrible color. I >suspect, however, that the color problem is a simple matter of figuring out >color spaces between NikonScan and Photoshop. If I could solve that, speed >would be the only problem. I've got 1.5 gigs of RAM on a G4. If there's a >way to effectively allocate more RAM to NikonScan (used as a plugin)...I'd >be happy as a clam. ;-) > >Joyfully, -david soderman- <>< > > > _________________________________________________________________ Hämta MSN Explorer kostnadsfritt på http://explorer.msn.se