Hi Todd,
> but no light source is capable of giving a better print than the other, in > and of, itself. Except for that darned Callier effect...which makes point light sources more susceptible to depth of focus, as well as dust, scratches etc. > I had bought a cold light hoping to improve my condenser prints--It didn't > work. That's most interesting. I found that I got much better tonality, and simply better overall prints, from my D2 with a cold light...and I had both one with a cold light, and one with a condenser head. I stopped using the condenser head because I got visibly (to me, and others BTW) better prints from the cold light enlarger. It's interesting as your experience is exactly the opposite from mine. ALL the fine art printers I know use cold light...as do all the high end labs I know! Regards, Austin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
