"Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>>>>>>>> Strength of 98, radius of 0.7, threshold of 2. Of course, this is a highly subjective setting. I do note that very small images usually require less unsharp masking than very large images to get visually similar results, but since the distinctions are small, I usually use this one setting for everything. <<<<<<<<<<<
I find that the first sharpening, that applied to the image from the scanner, needs much larger strength and radius values than the second and later sharpenings. Do you turn on sharpening in the scanner? (I haven't tried that yet, since my experience with in-camera sharpening (consumer dcams) is that it has too low threshold setting and aggravates noise something fierce, but maybe scanner sharpening isn't so obnoxious...) David J. Littleboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tokyo, Japan ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body