You are certainly right, Paul. Good catch. If Margulis is such an expert, how could he let that one slip by?
On 8/18/02 2:48 AM, "Paul D. DeRocco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I took a close look at those two horse images in the PDF file on page 280, > by magnifying the PDF as much as possible, so that the individual pixels > were easily visible as squares. What I found was that the image that he said > had been scanned at a higher resolution was actually rendered in the > document with exactly half the resolution. I don't know what's going on > here, but that's not a fair comparison. > > -- > > Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco > Paul mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> From: Julian Vrieslander >> >> It's from Dan Margulis' book "Professional Photoshop". A couple of the >> chapters are available on the web. Earlier in this thread, Preston Earle >> posted a link to one of them: >> >> <http://www.ledet.com/margulis/PP6_Chapter14.pdf> > -- Julian Vrieslander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
