I think the two images were published in reverse order relevant to the caption. ...Bob
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 11:48 PM Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Scanning with too much resolution? (was:PSsharpening...) I took a close look at those two horse images in the PDF file on page 280, by magnifying the PDF as much as possible, so that the individual pixels were easily visible as squares. What I found was that the image that he said had been scanned at a higher resolution was actually rendered in the document with exactly half the resolution. I don't know what's going on here, but that's not a fair comparison. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Julian Vrieslander > > It's from Dan Margulis' book "Professional Photoshop". A couple of the > chapters are available on the web. Earlier in this thread, Preston Earle > posted a link to one of them: > > <http://www.ledet.com/margulis/PP6_Chapter14.pdf> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
