gj.berg wrote:
There is a difference between zero and nothing. Zero is a stasis in a' something' that is the addition and subtraction of something.
Nothing on the other hand exists in no continuum -- because there is nothing there is no something to posit against it.
Nothing is philosophical -- it doesn't exist in our universe -- zero does exist or we have vacuums.
Jerry Berg
Mark D. Lew wrote:
At 12:22 AM 12/13/02, Cecil Rigby wrote:
Logically, one cannot "have," meaning "possess," the content of a null set.Well said. I have nothing to add to this.
An empty can is a container of emptiness. You may have the can, but not the
content. You can not divide what you cannot *have.*
mdl
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
-- David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale