[Brad Beyenhof:] >On Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:17 PM, Michael Edwards wrote: > >>I learned that the "beat" was the primary unit of rhythm, and >>that you could term subdivisions of that "pulses". >> Am I wrong on this? Or can you have it either way? > >I would've thought the same (and I originally had written it >that way in my post), but Read calls the large units "pulses" >and the small units "beats." I personally don't agree, but as >a scholar I just wanted to stay consistent with previous >research/publication.
It still sounds wrong: I mean, we say phrases like "on the third beat" - not "on the third pulse". I'm not sure what we call the subdivisions, and a generic term for them doesn't seem to be heard much. Thinking about it, I would probably just say "the third semiquaver", "the second quaver", or whatever was appropriate. I'm pretty sure where I read about the beat vs. pulse thing was when I was a boy, in Percy Scholes' "Junior Oxford Companion to Music". It is a simple reference work for children, but I would have thought Percy Scholes was a reputable reference in anything he wrote. It is a British work: could it be one of those things where U.K. and U.S. usage differ? - that is, what the British (and Australians) call a beat, the Americans call a pulse, and vice-versa? If so, it could potentially be a very confusing difference of usage. At least the "crotchet vs. quarter" thing is not ambiguous. [Randolph Peters:] >A point of clarification: >In Gardner Read's "Music Notation" (2nd ed. 1969) the author does not >seem to refer to pulses but he does call the larger units "beats." >The subdivisions are named the actual note length (eighth note or >whatever).... While it seems to agree with what I would say, it does confuse things further. Perhaps Randolph Peters is referring to a different work by Gardner Read from Brad - but that would have Read contradicting his own usage. But even if Brad were mistaken in quoting Read's usage (and I don't know if he is, because I don't have any works by Read to check), it doesn't resolve it completely - because I have heard this usage elsewhere (pulse being larger than beat), although not often. Regards, Michael Edwards. _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale