This situation brings to mind the Borland development tool Delphi. The first 3 versions were powerful tools and very well received, but v4, which introduced lots of "pretty" features and was somewhat rushed to marked in order to meet a shipping schedule, was very poorly received by the Delphi faithful on account of the numerous bugs and shortcomings which persisted even after a couple of maintenance releases. In response, Borland issued what amounted to a public apology, admitting the problems with v4 and re-committing themselves to releasing a solid, quality product. We did still have to pay for v5, but it was a rock solid product that also delivered new functionality.
I wouldn't mind seeing Coda take a similarly forthcoming position about the problems with Finale.
Aaron.
_______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale