All the design books I have read forbid the use of underlined text. In the first example that you give bold would be better. I have not found a single case where a combination of size, bold and italic is not enough.
[Of course if you are doing a transcription edition of, say, a sketchbook of lessons by Schönberg, then you may want to keep the underlined text of the original. But I think this an special case]. Anyway I might be wrong. Of course any bug should be killed! Saludos, Javier. David Bailey escribió: > I'm not quite sure why you are saying we should never use underline > style for text. I can think of instances where in a large text block of > instructions I would want the top line underlined. > > I can also think of other instances where I might want something > underlined, either in combination with bold or italic or both. > > In any regard, if it doesn't print properly, it is a bug which should be > fixed. > > David > > > > Javier Ruiz wrote: > >> Well, you should not use underline style, never. Bold or italic is okay. >> >> But of course is an annoying bug if you really need to use underline style >> (and you shouldn't) >> >> Saludos, Javier. >> >> >>> I just noticed this -- when applying the "underline" style to a font in >>> FinMac2004, the underline prints at a 45-degree angle away from the >>> text. Changing settings in the "Lines and Curves" section of the >>> Document Options has no effect. >>> >>> Can anyone else confirm? >>> >>> - Darcy >>> >>> ----- >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Brooklyn, NY >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Finale mailing list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Finale mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale >> > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
