Why don't you check yourself? Look at any major publisher's edition,
Bärenreiter, Henle, Peters, Breitkopf and Härtel, which ever. I am
pretty sure you will find that I am correct.
Johannes
Darcy James Argue wrote:
The correct way to number first and second endings is to number the
first bar of the first and second ending the same.
Really? So you're saying that, for a one-measure first and second
ending, *both* measures would have the same number?
Is that really standard practice? That seems like a really terrible
idea to me. I've always either done what John does, above (just number
consecutively, ignoring repeats) -- which I prefer -- or, when
necessary, renumber the entire repeat, film-score style, as you describe
below. I have never even considered having, for instance, two measure
9's in the same piece, one for the first ending, and one for the second.
What is the rationale for this?
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
