On 26 Mar 2005 at 9:29, d. collins wrote: > David W. Fenton écrit: > >Why are you raising the issue of TIFFs if you find them so > >unsatisfactory? If they don't work for you, they don't work, so why > >worry about them? > > I'm raising the issue of TIFFs precisely because they are > unsatisfactory, and because the only other possibility, EPS, is broken > and officially acknowledged as such by MM. It's been broken for at > least five years now. And probably will never get fixed, because not > enough of us are irked by Finale's broken features. I need to insert > scalable graphics into a Finale score. And have no way of doing so.
Well, I don't *need* scalable graphics, so I can't help you with MM. Yes, obviously, they should fix EPS, but lacking it in a usable form has no impact on me whatsoever, fortunately. I'm not sure I understand how they think they can get away with this -- don't *all* professional engravers and composers and anyone providing camera-ready copy to publishers (you never do that on paper any more, right?) need this? -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton David Fenton Associates http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
