> I'm raising the issue of TIFFs precisely because they are > unsatisfactory, and because the only other possibility, EPS, is broken > and officially acknowledged as such by MM. It's been broken for at > least five years now. And probably will never get fixed, because not > enough of us are irked by Finale's broken features.
> I'm not sure I understand how they think they can get away with this > -- don't *all* professional engravers and composers and anyone > providing camera-ready copy to publishers (you never do that on paper > any more, right?) need this? David Fenton Yes it remains a mystery, David. The logical conclusion is that Finale no longer intends to meet the needs of professional engravers. Although I copy posts such as this to MM I received no denials. Richard Yates _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
