I haven't actually looked at Sibelius in a long time, but in David's
case I am actually pretty sure he would find a lot of things to his
liking in Sibelius. The basic concept of the application is much more
what he has been asking for. Partly because Sibelius is a more modern
package. But also considering what David does, I actually wonder whether
Sibelius would actually be much more suited to his work than Finale.
Johannes
shirling & neueweise schrieb:
From: "David W. Fenton"
For all those who claim the Sibelius UI is so intuitive, I'd like to
hear an explanation. Was I unable to find the methods for
accomplishing basic things (i.e., bad UI), or is Sibelius simply
unable to do the things I was puzzled by (i.e., badly designed
application)?
it may be you just don't know the programme. i used it recently and
found some things frustrating because i hadn't figured out how to do
them, but saw a colleague working just as fast on sib as i do on finale,
i just hadn't mastered the keyboard shortcuts.
not a concrete answer, but there is no reason to judge it so harshly:
you (as i am) are a sibelius beginner and experienced finale user. maybe
reading a sib manual would help... or at the very least giving it a more
than cursory test drive.
cheers,
jef
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
