At 12/15/2006 12:36 PM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote: >At 09:17 AM 12/15/06 -0800, Mark D Lew wrote: >>I've long felt the same way about blogs, which are essentially built as >>a perpetual top-post. Why can't they add new items to the bottom and >>push old ones off the top, instead of vice versa? As far as I can >>tell, the blogging softwares don't even offer that as an option. >>I'm used to it by now, but I've always thought it was stupid. > >It's funny about that. My blog is set up as daily commentaries (not using >blogging software), one commentary per day, oldest first, and I've received >complaints that it doesn't make sense that way, even though it has an >up-front index. :)
I don't think it is the order of primary posts. It is the order of "replies to primary posts". I would expect to see primary posts date ordered from newest to oldest. I would expect to see replies to primary posts from oldest to newest. I guess you have it half right ;-) Phil Daley < AutoDesk > http://www.conknet.com/~p_daley _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
