At 10:23 AM +0100 1/13/07, Daniel Wolf wrote:
On Jan 12, 2007, at 5:38 PM, John Howell wrote:

Opera was entertainment, and can only be compared with musical theater today

This is a claim that is made again and again, but on any close inspection will fall apart. It's clear that Viennese Opera was a form of entertainment for upper classes, but the entire function of entertainment is difficult to map one-to-one to mass entertainment today.

Absolutely true, for the simple reason that prior to the 20th century "popular taste" could not exist in the stratified, class-conscious societies of Europe and, yes, America, with its pre-melting-pot amalgam of ethnic enclaves and rigid class distinctions in the Eastern seacoast cities, where the upper classes paid for the construction of concert halls and opera houses. Many deride the rise of popular music in the 20th century and its dominant position today, but it is the first true "music of the people" ever to exist.

Opera was understood as a vehicle for the virtuoso demonstration of a body of music and cultural conventions and patterns, for technical innovation within the context of those convention, and also as a civic and moral instance. The coherence of Opera as a genre depended less on the coherence of a single opera as a work of music or literature or theatre than its coherence within a tradition whose conventions and patterns would be understood by a small audience who returned night after night, over many years, and who would have recognized the same conventions and patterns in an elevated literary tradition in which they read, in sophisticated sacred and secular concerted music they heard, and in the civic and courtly lives that they led.

Oh, well put!!! And goes a long way toward explaining why Greek mythology, which was part of a classical education, was so popular in early Italian opera and English masques alike.

One might argue that the _Singspiel_ , with a wider audience, was particularly close to the musical, but despite its connections to the /Prater/, the very best examples of Singspiel (/Die Zauberflöte, Die Entführung aus dem Serail/) clearly have their own moral ambitions.

It's interesting that the English theaters of Shakespeare's time deliberately appealed to both the connoisseurs and the groundlings, and did so quite successfully, while opera in ANY country through the 18th century seems not to have done so. Certainly Singspiel and Zarzuela had broader popular appeal than Opera Seria, but we're still basically talking about court entertainments. The first public opera house in Venice opened in 1637, but I wonder whether the "public" was not mostly aristocrats and middle-class wannabe aristocrats who could afford the subscriptions.

John


--
John & Susie Howell
Virginia Tech Department of Music
Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A 24061-0240
Vox (540) 231-8411  Fax (540) 231-5034
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/howell/howell.html

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to