Hi Johannes,

I basically agree, and this is something I've been trying to impress upon Tom and Gary. But their vision of the typical GPO customer is very different from yours and mine. The library is beloved by sequencer-based tweakers because it's inexpensive and highly customizable. At the same time, it's an uneasy fit with notation software because of many of the problems you describe. Robert P.'s Human Playback goes a long way towards bridging the gap, but he can't do everything. At some point (hopefully sooner rather than later), Garritan have to get serious about making their products (or at least, the Notation versions) work better out of the box, and MakeMusic need to meet them halfway.

However, this is one area where Finale is actually currently much better than Sibelius. It would be nice to see MM try to widen their lead in the areas where they have a lead, rather than always trying to play catch-up.

- Darcy
-----
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY



On 23 Feb 2007, at 5:38 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:

The point is, it should work out of the box. It doesn't. It's poor design, and it is too much hassle for me to even get a reasonable result most of the time.
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to