My experience is that FIN2008b is the best at upgrading files from 3.5.2 on up. I've spent most of this year upgrading large numbers of old 3.5.2 choral files directly into 2008b with great success. No other version could retain most of the "look" on the page. Yes, there are a few issues (text blocks) but because of a near perfect rendition of the music there is minimal editing and proofing to be done. I'm glad I held out. The amount of time and money wasted on upgrading the files throughout the years for each version would have been huge. It's nice to know they finally listened to some of us complaining about the lack of concern and care being put into upgrading legacy files.
Cheers, Steve 7/16/08 7:18 AM, "Robert Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would be curious to know what kinds of problems you've seen upgrading > files in recent versions. I of course use PDFs too. But I generally > upgrade to the latest version if I need to make changes. In the 1990s I > would never have done so. _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
