it's true, it's a lame first step, and probably less functional than using
MusicXML export in Cubase 4.1, but being that they've gotten started in this
direction, and the two programs have the same ownership, wouldn't you say
some Sibelius\Protools beats will 'almost definitely' be the first true
hybrid of a notation program and sequencer, that holy grail for people who
can both read AND hear? :p

2009/1/16 Eric Dannewitz <ericd...@jazz-sax.com>

> Except that it is a ONE WAY deal. So, you can record something Midi in
> PT, and then dump it into Sibelius to make it look good, but
> then.............it is stuck in Sibelius unless you want to export it
> as a Midi........
>
> Maybe if PT 8.5 or PT9 gets bi-directional data between PT and
> Sibelius I'd be worried...........
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Adam Golding <adamgold...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I just stumbled across the news that Protools now has a
> "sibelius-powered"
> > score editor--looks like it's still rudimentary, but it LOOKS great
> compared
> > to cubase and logic--anyone's thoughts on what this direction spells for
> the
> > future of finale in the sibelius/finale war?
> >
> > http://www.vimeo.com/2121604
> > _______________________________________________
> > Finale mailing list
> > Finale@shsu.edu
> > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Finale mailing list
> Finale@shsu.edu
> http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
>
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to