Oh, good to know, then--I hadn't actually tried protools yet--I guess they also need to buy a company with a good midi editor ;-)
I just stumbled on the new Cubase 5 release--the new midi editing features pretty much blow the competition out of the water for orchestral midi work--click on 'superconductor' on their new intro: http://www.steinberg.net/ 2009/1/16 Eric Dannewitz <ericd...@jazz-sax.com> > No, because the Midi Sequencing in ProTools still sucks compared to > Logic/DP/Cubase. It is a LOT better in PT8, but it still has a long > way to go. > > Plus, any Virtual Instruments you want to use in an arrangement need > have to have a RTAS version, which most do, but not all. You can use > an adapter program to convert AU or VST instruments to RTAS > but........... > > It's not the holy grail at all. It is a good step to making PT catch > up in an area where it is lagging....... > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Adam Golding <adamgold...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > it's true, it's a lame first step, and probably less functional than > using > > MusicXML export in Cubase 4.1, but being that they've gotten started in > this > > direction, and the two programs have the same ownership, wouldn't you say > > some Sibelius\Protools beats will 'almost definitely' be the first true > > hybrid of a notation program and sequencer, that holy grail for people > who > > can both read AND hear? :p > > > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > Finale@shsu.edu > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
