>On 13 Feb 2009 at 23:27, Aaron Sherber wrote: > >> Also -- and I admit this isn't particularly relevant here -- >comparing >> file sizes isn't really an adequate way of comparing the >files. You're >> saying that because one file is only a few bytes bigger or smaller, >> there can't be much difference between the two. But of >course, even if >> the two JPGs were exactly the same size, the actual data could be >> wildly different. > >But I actually *looked* at the files. I maximized the window I >was viewing them in, opened all 6, and flipped through them. >This meant that they were appearing all in exactly the same >location onscreen, pixel for pixel, so that any differences in >even a few pixels would have jumped out. There was no visible >difference between the files. >None whatsoever. > >-- >David W. Fenton http://dfenton.com
I did it again with edits (fairly small, e.g. non-clipping, adjustments to brightness, contrast, hue, and saturation) that I reversed on the next pass and did get successive degradation. _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
