I would suggest numbering all of the measures around the cut. I think
the arrow could help, also.
RBH
Jari Williamsson wrote:
Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
The measure number has no particular significance other than being
the address (to borrow a computer term) of the measure. The only
important consideration is that the measure number of a particular
measure should be the same in the score and in all parts. Instead of
the proposed arrow, I might put a footnote by the measure number at
the end of the section, and use a footnote in the score and parts to
indicate that there were four measures omitted.
Using my example, if the conductor asks to begin at measure 55 and
some musicians count backwards from the extra 60 measure number,
they'll start 4 measures before where the conductor starts if they
don't see/read the footnote.
Also, the parts have numerous other occasions where measure number
jumps, so putting footnotes at each such will clutter the parts
considerably.
(All movements where there are cuts will be listed on an index page.)
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
