I was assuming both the measure before and the measure after the cut would be numbered, with the arrow between them. (In B'way music, every measure is numbered.)
Including both numbers without the arrow would be confusing. With the arrow, it's perfectly clear what is going on. Cheers, - DJA ----- WEB: http://secretsociety.typepad.com On 18 Jan 2010, at 6:03 PM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote: > Darcy James Argue wrote: >> Noel, >> >> I don't get the enthusiasm for reinventing the wheel here. This situation >> pops up in the Broadway pit all the time. The arrow works, and is far more >> concise than the alternate solutions being proposed. >> > Well, I know as much about the conventions in Broadway music scores as I do > about the notation software package S~, the only difference between my > knowledge of the two, is that the former has just happened, and the latter > has been intentional. So if I'm "re-inventing the wheel", it's only because I > am not aware of the other wheel(s) already in existence. I'm not sure I agree > that the arrow is more concise than Dr. Howells suggestion of numbering the > measure before, in addition to the number after the elision. > > ns > _______________________________________________ > Finale mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
