Cliff,

I think that David's response is a good work around.  In addition I would like 
to mention that I have had succes combining both approaches, even though it 
takes a lot of time.  Basically, I created a score that was easy to read and 
reads the way I want the music to be interpreted.  I gave that score to the 
members of the ensemble.  However,  I also made a score that played back the 
way I wanted and gave the ensemble an mp3 of the Finale playback.


all the best,


Bruce Eisenbeil



-----Original Message-----
From: finale-request <finale-requ...@shsu.edu>
To: finale <finale@shsu.edu>
Sent: Sun, Feb 3, 2013 1:00 pm
Subject: Finale Digest, Vol 115, Issue 3


Send Finale mailing list submissions to
        finale@shsu.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        finale-requ...@shsu.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
        finale-ow...@shsu.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Finale digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Different meters in different systems (Clif Ashcraft)
   2. Re: Different meters in different systems (David H. Bailey)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 13:27:17 -0500
From: Clif Ashcraft <wa2...@optonline.net>
Subject: [Finale] Different meters in different systems
To: <finale@shsu.edu>
Message-ID: <6913ee50-c4cf-4fcf-90f8-b4e11b389...@optonline.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I just had one devil of a time getting Benjamin Britten's "Festival Te Deum" 
into Finale 2012.  My purpose was getting the music into a rehearsal CD for my 
choir, so playback, not appearance was the first order of business.  The piece 
is difficult because the organ accompaniment, in a large part of the piece, 
grinds along in 3/4 time playing an ornament followed by a big chord with a 
slight pause after the chord.  Each organ event adds up to the time it takes to 
play three quarter notes.  The choral part, on the other hand, is written with 
a 
very irregular set of time signatures, 5/8, 7/8, 4/4, 3/8, 2/4, and even an 
occasional 3/4.  The published music has all the bar lines lining up, but of 
course, as actually played they rarely do line up.  

I tried a couple of schemes to get different time signatures to apply for the 
accompaniment, and some of them looked ok.  None of them played ok.  My final 
recourse was to leave the irregular time signatures for the choir parts in 
place 
for all of the systems and create a 3/4 time organ gracenote/chord/pause for 
the 
first event, which I just drag copied over and over again, changing the notes 
after the drag to match what Britten had written.  It looked awful, but played 
just fine.  Occasionally the 3/4 measures containing the chords would line up 
with the choir parts, but not very often.

Does anyone know how to convince Finale to show a different time signature for 
different parts and still have it play correctly?  Note that it HAS to play 
correctly, appearance is secondary except that it simplifies entering the 
notes, 
ie, I would have liked very much to have just keyed in the chords as dotted 
half 
notes with a playable articulation for the pause rather than the kludgy drag 
copy procedure I had to use which resulted in chords being tied over bar lines 
with strange combinations of half note tied to quarter notes, eighth notes tied 
to dotted quarter tied to quarter in the next measure, etc.

                                Clif Ashcraft


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 17:27:22 -0500
From: "David H. Bailey" <dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com>
Subject: Re: [Finale] Different meters in different systems
To: <finale@shsu.edu>
Message-ID: <510d92ca.5090...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed

On 2/2/2013 1:27 PM, Clif Ashcraft wrote:
> I just had one devil of a time getting Benjamin Britten's "Festival Te Deum" 
into Finale 2012.  My purpose was getting the music into a rehearsal CD for my 
choir, so playback, not appearance was the first order of business.  The piece 
is difficult because the organ accompaniment, in a large part of the piece, 
grinds along in 3/4 time playing an ornament followed by a big chord with a 
slight pause after the chord.  Each organ event adds up to the time it takes to 
play three quarter notes.  The choral part, on the other hand, is written with 
a 
very irregular set of time signatures, 5/8, 7/8, 4/4, 3/8, 2/4, and even an 
occasional 3/4.  The published music has all the bar lines lining up, but of 
course, as actually played they rarely do line up.
>
> I tried a couple of schemes to get different time signatures to apply for the 
accompaniment, and some of them looked ok.  None of them played ok.  My final 
recourse was to leave the irregular time signatures for the choir parts in 
place 
for all of the systems and create a 3/4 time organ gracenote/chord/pause for 
the 
first event, which I just drag copied over and over again, changing the notes 
after the drag to match what Britten had written.  It looked awful, but played 
just fine.  Occasionally the 3/4 measures containing the chords would line up 
with the choir parts, but not very often.
>
> Does anyone know how to convince Finale to show a different time signature 
> for 
different parts and still have it play correctly?  Note that it HAS to play 
correctly, appearance is secondary except that it simplifies entering the 
notes, 
ie, I would have liked very much to have just keyed in the chords as dotted 
half 
notes with a playable articulation for the pause rather than the kludgy drag 
copy procedure I had to use which resulted in chords being tied over bar lines 
with strange combinations of half note tied to quarter notes, eighth notes tied 
to dotted quarter tied to quarter in the next measure, etc.
>

This has been a long-standing complaint about Finale (and Sibelius) 
while you can have independent time signatures in different staves, the 
barlines always line up and each measure in the different staves 
occupies the same time, so a 3/4 measure in one staff takes the same 
amount of time as a 4/4 measure in the same place on a different staff.

The workaround is to figure out the largest common denominator for all 
the different time signatures to figure out where they overlap and then 
set that as the time signature for all staves and put in the differing 
time signatures and barlines as graphics.

So if you've got 3/4 in some staves and 4/4 in other staves, you set the 
time signature to be 12/4 and then all the beats will line up.  With 
more widely divergent meters the measures get larger and larger.  For 
some it's nearly impossible to do what you want.

Since appearance isn't important you can enter the easiest staves first 
and then simply do the mental math to calculate ties and rhythms to get 
the notes to line up properly.


-- 
David H. Bailey
dhbai...@davidbaileymusicstudio.com



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


End of Finale Digest, Vol 115, Issue 3
**************************************


 
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to