That does seem to be the experience of the majority. However, the vendors claim great success and apparently some people are finding it good enough to use, at least occasionally. If there are hardware/software/parameter combinations that improve the results, I'd like to discover that because I would use this function a lot if it didn't require manually editing every single measure.
I still believe that the goal for software should be, "If the human brain can easily do it, then software ought to be able to reach that same level." Clearly even in the most optimistic case, music recognition software is only 5% of the way toward that ideal. On 1/22/2014 3:02 PM, Lawrence Yates wrote: > I gave up with scanning music - there were so many mistakes that it was > easier and quicker to re-type the entire document than scan, check and > correct. > > Sorry, > > Lawrence > _______________________________________________ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
