I don't want to get into an argument, but his response should never have
been posted. No one insulted him. His remarks were uncalled for. He is
lacking in good manners. He owes the group an apology!
Stan 


On 4/27/06 4:55 PM, "Laine Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 4/27/06 4:30 PM, "Brian O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> On Thursday 27 April 2006 1:49 pm, Stanley Williams wrote:
>> I agree with Stan completely on this. I have had issues over the last 3 years
>> and have always gotten a response and the vast majority of the instances I
>> got a fix too. When I didn't I never even remotely considered being angry.
>> This is aterrible attitude and you do owe a very sincere apology!
>> Brian
> 
> The thread is spinning a little off center, but I don't think htodd was
> offended that he wasn't being helped. Rather, I think he was reacting to his
> suggestions' being deprecated by others while he was trying to help me.
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Fink-beginners mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners

Reply via email to