>Thanks! Just trying to absorb all of this! It looks like a very elegant >solution. > >I have a few questions. > >First, are you making the built-in /usr/bin/emacs part of this system? >Will add-ons automatically get byte-compiled for it? > >Second, do you anticipate that all of fink's emacs packages will be >part of this system in the near future? Right now it is tricky, with >the emacs packages in stable NOT being part of this system.
The goal of course should be to get the current emacs into stable as soon as possible :) I am using emacs-nox from unstable all the time, and it runs very stable and reliably for me (although I am must confess, I am not doing excessive testing, nothing much besides editing text) > It would >be great if xemacs could be made part of the same system. Indeed, but are the two even compatible enough to make this reasonable? > Also, I'm >not sure what the role of emacs-alpha is. Cheers, Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
