At this point, it'd be cleaner to do something like the debian/control file, where the subpackage-specific pieces broken into separate chunks, separated by a blank line, each headed with its own "Package:" field. Munging this information into the names of the fields themselves is not a pretty thing.
Of course, this is all moot, once the .info format is moved to something nestable like XML. =) On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > I have one small problem with your proposal, it only lets us > make 2 debs from one build. > I am going to put my proposal in an example: [...snip...] > Debs: shlibs, docs, bin > DebShlibs: %i/lib/libmylib-1.2.3.dylib %i/lib/libmystuff-1.2.3. > DebDocs: %i/share/mystuff/* > DebBin: %i/bin/* > BinDepends: %n-shlibs (= %v-%r) > BinDocFiles: README > BinRecommends: %n-docs (= %v-%r) > ShlibsDocFiles: README > ShlibsRecommends: %n-bin (= %v-%r), %n-docs (= %v-%r) > DocsDocFiles: README _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
