I fully agree with this, it hurts on one to have them but helps us developpers in the mean time.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Someday, later, we will want to introduce Shlibs and start to use it. >If we are sure that this will be the name of the field, it would be nice >to have "fink validate" not object to it. (Causes less confusion when we >actually start to use it.) We don't make point releases of the fink >package manager very often, so I thought it would be good to include this >field now for future use (like we did with the BuildDependsOnly field). ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst Phone: (780)-408-3094 Fax: (780)-454-3200 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel