At 16:09 Uhr -0500 28.03.2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Max, > > I can understand your position and respect the desire not to >dilute the Fink policy unless absolutely positively necessary, even >if-- in this one case-- I disagree. > > And I *fully* support your proposal regarding a third party >section. I actually have a few Fink packages I have put together >that will never be accepted because they completely violate policy; >the most notable being the Jode package (as it installs a binary). > > It would be nice if there was a mechanism for injecting a >hunk of .info files into fink; ones that are completely unsupported >or totally local.
Prolly, yeah. One idea would be to use yet another tree for it, say "thirdparty" or so. Writing some inject scripts wouldn't be hard, and we could also write a tool to add this to fink.conf (if you think it's not enough to explain to users how to make that change). Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
