At 15:53 Uhr -0400 29.05.2002, David R. Morrison wrote: >It was brought up today on #fink that in the shared libraries project, there >has not been total consistency in how we are using the -bin and -dev >variants. > >I admit to being somewhat at fault here. Although we clearly spelled out >in the policy discussions that -bin should be used when the library is >the primary thing, and -dev should be used when the binaries are the >primary thing, it turns out that at the moment it is much easier to do the >upgrade when -dev is chosen. So I may have chosen -dev a bit too often >in my zeal to finish this project promptly. > >I am willing to go back and re-do any cases which people feel are egregious >violations of policy. Please let me know which ones should be redone.
sdl-mixer and sdl-image fall into this category. Also I think glib2 -> in fact the glib2 package itself only contains files that make only sense if glib2-dev is installed, unless I am mistaken, thus it would seem to me glib2-dev should be completly merged into glib2. Cheers, Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
