On Friday, Sep 20, 2002, at 01:07 Australia/Melbourne, David R. Morrison wrote:
> You've hit on the important point, here. We want fink packages to > compile the > same way on everybody's system, no matter what they have installed. > What this > implies is: if the configure file will behave differently depending on > whether > a certain package is present or not, then we make sure that the > package is > present. I suppose (grudgingly) this makes sense ... which means more hand editing I suppose. Is anyone interested in my "minimal" tree? > Many of the dependencies you are worried about are "build" > dependencies only. > You might want to use fink's binary packages instead, if you're still > on 10.1. > (Binary packages for 10.2 are probably at least another month away.) I'm on 10.2, but I'm also compiling my own packages so I can put them into /Fink. --M. * * * http://beebo.org ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
