so as a temp fix why don't we make use of GCC: 3.1 and if GCC: 3.1 then CPPFLAGS = -I/sw/include instead of -isystem??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Anyway, the workaround (disabling isystem) will quite likely be needed >for any C++ package. I am not saying i object to it.. isystem may >actually be preferable.. but currently it does seem to break more than >it helps. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
