On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 08:35:12PM +0000, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > David R. Morrison wrote: > > | Well, I have to agree, I hadn't noticed that the "old" version of mysql > | has a different splitoff than the most recent version. I simply noticed > | the duplication and assumed that one was obsolete. > | > | Peter, what's the plan here? > > How would you suggest they be named? > > It is quite likely that I screwed up the naming, the shlibs package (at > least) needed renaming to comply with policy.
Maybe the main packages (and .info filenames) should be mysql10 and mysql12, which contain -dev and -shlibs splitoffs (as in general for library packages). The userland programs could go in -bin or %N (or maybe in "mysql" if they're interchangeable). dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
