Thanks for the clarification !
Best,
Jean-Francois
On Jan 6, 2004, at 4:58 PM, TheSin wrote:
sure everyone was complaining so i just changed it.I don't understand what you're referring to here: who was complaining about what ?
Some other issue ?
As for ffmpeg they are builddeps even if they are built at the same time, it won't hurt it in anyway and someday if they become separate pkgs as I have been thinking about doing, I won't have to change anything.Thanks a lot _ at least I undertand now what was your idea _
even if I still disagree : the build of about any package will very
depend at some stages on already build parts (eg, libs) of its splitoffs;
BuildDepends shouldn't care about that: its role is to indicate what
other pkgs must be installed for a proper build.
Again _ what is "the first problem" _ and the other(s) ?
So even though i agree that pkging was at fault for the first problem
and not fink it's self, I disagree about ffmpeg, I think it is right. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 6-Jan-04, at 8:04 AM, jfm wrote:
"Don't worry _ it'll work out, and has to be this way".
Justin _ can you explain what you had in mind ? (and probably adapt ffmpeg to the new situation ...)
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
