On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 03:08:13PM -0800, Ben Hines wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2004, at 9:09 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > > >The DescDetail is one giant line, so it looks like crap on plain-text > >displays. A couple of weeks ago I added a validator warning for this a > >couple of weeks ago, but I don't think it's gotten into a fink-release > >yet. > > All desc fields should be hard wrapped, i have always rejected > submitted packages which don't. (though usually i just hard-wrap it > before committing)
I added a note about this to DescDetail and DescUsage a coupla days ago. I didn't for DescPackaging and DescPort because these fields don't seem to be displayed by any commands. Should the Packaging Manual mention it (and the validator check) these fields as well. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
