-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Jim White wrote: | While it is correct to remove the package (DMCA and PATRIOT acts being | what they are), I think that the meaning of all this is that the | restriction stated in the fatback manual is a violation of GPL.
Correct. And yet we have a statement from the author acknowledging it is invalid, and stating that fatback is wholly covered by the GPL.
Did it now make it to the list? I'll forward it now.
cheers,
martin - -- - -- Martin Langhoff |||| http://nzl.com.ar/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFA8xAAxMcU+h4F1RYRAmJ2AJ9e98pN04oh8WwqDg6/bmox6ljVSACeKgVz WZs57Me4Z8RPgUMDxoBMISk= =EoeS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
