We were trying to design a system in which users could continue to use things they had already compiled under 10.3 and combine them with new things.
On 18 Apr 2005, at 15:58, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
I must correct my suggestion actually, not symlinks, shell scripts, 'exec g++-3.3 "$@"' etc.On 18 Apr 2005, at 15:04, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
The only thing I can suggest is having a %p/lib/fink/override/ <tree>/bin/g++
and gcc and cc,c++ as symlinks to g++-3.3 and gcc-3.3 etc and fink ensuring
that %p/lib/fink/override/<tree>/bin/ comes first in $PATH when building stuff.
The only difference is that using the path skulduggery will also catch things that just do g++ or c++ as the compiler.
Are we sure that mixing things compiled with 'g++-3.3' on panther and on tiger has no problems ?
I've no experience with this _ I did rebuild things in build-order on tiger.
dmr has experience that mixing things compiled on tiger under g++-3.3 and g++-4.0 with -fabi-version=1
goes well _ and I have similar experience with -fabi-version=0.
But I am slightly sceptical with mixing 'g++-3.3' "no-abi-version" from panther and tiger...
JF
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
