-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Yup that is the fix, you could use %v-%r though.
To me, the section in the unstable libdnet
SplitOff: << Package: %N1-shlibs Conflicts: %N-shlibs Replaces: %N (<< 1.5-2), %N-shlibs
looks very much in contradiction with Fink shlibs policy. Why is this called %N1-shlibs when it provides the library with the same install_name as the previous %N-shlibs?
Either the library is compatible with the older one, as its install_name and the higher compatibility number indicate, then the package name should be the same, or it is incompatible, then it should get a different install_name and no Conflicts/Replaces need to be there.
What is the reason for this weird situation? Shouldn't the reason at least be mentioned in the info file?
-- Martin
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
