On 2005-07-09, Koen van der Drift wrote: > Hi, > > (repost from April 2005) > > I recently took over maintainership for the package > 'python-biopython-py'. However, I think the name biopython-py would be > more appropriate. Unless there is a special reason why (some) python > packages have the python prefix, although most don't. > > Would it be a big problem, if I rename the package? I can leave in the > old info files, and add the new ones. The new ones will only be updated > in the future.
It might be better to remove the old .info file, and use Provides: python-biopython-py in the new package. Other than that suggestion, I have no opinion. crh
pgpTGzu9fTt37.pgp
Description: PGP signature
