Hi folks: Periodically, I see posted on other mailing lists or bulletin boards a question like "should I use fink or Darwinports or ..."? I'm not sure what it says about my state of mind, but I always read these and come away somewhat disappointed, because fink often seems to take a beating.
The most current example is a thread on the TextMate mailing list. (TextMate is a nice editor for OS X, btw). http://murl.info/14677 Of the replies, I seem to be the only person who likes fink. (When I first started grad school a thousand years ago, I met someone who told me he was from Brooklyn. I said I had never been there. His reply was "That's ok. You don't need Brooklyn, and Brooklyn doesn't need you.) I wonder if this is something we should worry about, or whether we should be like my grad student friend? I noticed rather few had anything of substance to say, but there were references to fink being more cumbersome, the "unstable" branch being the only one up to date, etc. Is it worth assessing how fink is presented to the user community, or the demarcation between stable and unstable (or even whether the name "unstable", which I assume is inherited from debian, really conveys the intended message)? Sorry in advance if I am just being neurotic about this. Bill ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
