On Nov 15, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:

>
> On Nov 15, 2006, at 2:44 PM, David Reiser wrote:
>
>> I've been wrangling with gnucash dependencies for a while. Early on
>> it was possible to avoid the crypto tree by getting unified versions
>> of libofx and crypt-ssleay-pm packaged.
>>
>> Gwenhywfar and aqbanking will be crypto for the foreseeable future
>> because they implement the crypto for the German hbci banking.
>>
>> When I submitted the info files to the tracker, I had handled the ssl
>> dependencies in gwen and aqbanking the same way as they were handled
>> in libofx and crypt-ssleay: forcing the use of the system openssl
>> libraries.
>>
>> Considering that the main use of gwen and aqbanking will be gnucash,
>> is it appropriate to restrict gwen and aqbanking to the system
>> openssl versions (so that all use of ssl in a fully enabled gnucash
>> goes through the system versions), or should the dependency be
>> softened to allow the fink openssl versions?
>
> If a package is licensed under the GPL without an exception, it may
> not be linked to fink's openssl, end of story. So, no, the restriction
> should not be "softened", you ned to use the libssl and libcrypto that
> ship with the OS.
>
> However, if the packages have a GPL exception allowing openssl, then
> it is okay.
>
> Peter
>
Both aqbanking and gwenhywfar have the openssl linking allowed  
exception to LGPL/GPL. So it would be OK to let them link to openssl.

So, is it either desirable or required that the info files allow it?

Dave
--
David Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to