On 13 Jan 2007, at 17:30, Jack Howarth wrote: > JF > The fat libgcc files are as expected...
Of course. Was just correcting an inaccuracy... > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 04:00:47PM +0100, Jean-François Mertens wrote: >> >> On 13 Jan 2007, at 14:59, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >>> Dave, >>> The analysis of gcc42 is incorrect. There are no fat binaries >>> created but rather an explicit 64-bit subdirectory. >> A small correction: at least I am getting 3 fat libraries /sw/lib/ >> gcc4.2/lib/libgcc_s.*.dylib >> >> Jean-Francois > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
