On 2/2/07, Robert T Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander Hansen wrote: > > You'd have to rebuild the package--the Depends information is coded > > into the .deb file. (or you could manually unpack the .deb file, edit > > the control file, and repack it). > > > > The issue is that fink treats 0:x.y.z = x.y.z, but apt thinks 0:x.y.z >> > > x.y.z > > Thanks! I understand now and was afraid that would be the answer. With > almost any other package I would rebuild it at the drop of a hat, but > of course it takes a bit longer with this particular one. (Manually > editing the .deb would certainly be faster.) I hope that if it's fixed > that the revision isn't bumped.... I'll probably go ahead and rebuild > it anyway to keep apt-get happy and humming along. > > I suppose it's worth a feature request that the validator check for > extraneous "%e:" on "unepoched" packages.... > Yeah, we were talking about just that on IRC.
-- Alexander K. Hansen (akh) Fink Documenter (still) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
