Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: > I think, that I read, somewhere, that 2.27 is protocol-compatible with > 2.13… (though I may be wrong) > > On 9/28/07, Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It is indeed still the case. The existing unison package builds >> executables for 2.9.1, 2.10.2, and 2.13.16; I believe at the time most >> Linux distros included the first, the second was the upstream stable >> release, and the third was the upstream "beta". >> >> A simple way to update the unstable packaging would be just to _add_ >> what is needed to build 2.27.x , though it would also be good to move >> from lablgtk to lablgtk2. >> > > > It hasn't worked for me--though there may be a switch that I'm not setting.
-- Alexander K. Hansen Fink User Liaison/Documenter akh AT finkproject DOT org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
