Cool!

Did you package llvm libraries/headers separately? Or is it just
strictly gcc-oriented package? (sorry, didn't have time to look at it)

On 12/28/07, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   In case anyone is interested, I posted test
> packaging for a llvm-gcc42 package on fink
> tracking based on a current svn pull for
> llvm and llvm-gcc42 branch. The gcc and g++
> compilers should be in good shape but the
> gfortran compiler still needs some work.
>                     Jack
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Fink-devel mailing list
> Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
>


-- 
Alexey Zakhlestin
http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel

Reply via email to