Alexey, I am currently installing both llvm and llvm-gcc-4.2 but I am not sure if the first is really required. Hopefully the gfortran support will improve over the next few months. Here is the comment I got on its current status...
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2007-December/011963.html Jack On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:16:22AM +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: > Cool! > > Did you package llvm libraries/headers separately? Or is it just > strictly gcc-oriented package? (sorry, didn't have time to look at it) > > On 12/28/07, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In case anyone is interested, I posted test > > packaging for a llvm-gcc42 package on fink > > tracking based on a current svn pull for > > llvm and llvm-gcc42 branch. The gcc and g++ > > compilers should be in good shape but the > > gfortran compiler still needs some work. > > Jack > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Fink-devel mailing list > > Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel > > > > > -- > Alexey Zakhlestin > http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
