On Feb 7, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
>
> Fink often has newer versions of libraries than apple does, and
> switching packages between using apple's vs fink's dependencies is
> difficult at best. For this specific case, I'm assuming you're on
> 10.5: 10.4 does not have expat, so would need to play a lot of
> compatibility games or else each OS would need entirely separate
> package sets anything that used expat. The main reason many have
> pushed hard to use apple's openssl is for licensing and/or US
> cryptography-export-restriction reasons...fink's openssl is newer than
> apple's, last I checked.
>

Yes, 10.5 here. For backwards compatibility the thing is clear and I  
also understand the versions issue.

Currently the openssl version is the same, 0.9.7l, and expat is only a  
bit older, apple's 2.0.0, fink's 2.0.1.

Thanks,

Aleix


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel

Reply via email to