On Feb 7, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > > Fink often has newer versions of libraries than apple does, and > switching packages between using apple's vs fink's dependencies is > difficult at best. For this specific case, I'm assuming you're on > 10.5: 10.4 does not have expat, so would need to play a lot of > compatibility games or else each OS would need entirely separate > package sets anything that used expat. The main reason many have > pushed hard to use apple's openssl is for licensing and/or US > cryptography-export-restriction reasons...fink's openssl is newer than > apple's, last I checked. >
Yes, 10.5 here. For backwards compatibility the thing is clear and I also understand the versions issue. Currently the openssl version is the same, 0.9.7l, and expat is only a bit older, apple's 2.0.0, fink's 2.0.1. Thanks, Aleix ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel