On 14-Mar-08, at 02:46 , Martin Costabel wrote:

> Jean-François Mertens wrote:
> []
>> but right, if true it would encourage a fast update of anything in
>> fink to gcc43
>
> I too have come round to the conclusion that this is indeed the best
> plan for action at this moment. I would suggest that we band together
> and do this update rather quickly.
>
> I am CCing fink-devel so that the maintainers of the 28 packages
> concerned get a chance to act, but I think we should just test this
> upgrade for each of these packages and then simply go ahead and change
> any package that builds correctly with gcc43. As far as I know, no
> problem with the switch from gcc42 to gcc43 has yet been reported.
>
> Here are the package descriptions concerned:
>
> sci/avl.info
> sci/qprop.info
> sci/xfoil.info

I have confirmed that avl, qprop and xfoil build with gcc43 on Intel.   
I am in the process of testing them to be sure they still run  
correctly.  I'll commit the updates once they have passed my run tests.

--
Kevin Horton
Ottawa, Canada




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel

Reply via email to