Hi Martin, How does one make a distinct package for 10.4? From what I can see on my system the 10.5 directory is a symlink to 10.4 which to me implies that there is no distinction. Would it make sense to have wine-10.4.info and a wine-10.5.info package?
I'm quite happy to create/maintain these packages, but I do not have a 10.4 system readily available to test on. Cheers, Damian Martin Costabel wrote: > Damian Dimmich wrote: >> With regards to wine and opengl there is a nice thread of discussion >> on here: >> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10184 >> >> It looks like there's a bug in xquartz that is preventing opengl from >> working properly (although mesa works fine). Hopefully an updated >> version of xquartz will solve this problem. >> >> On a different note, it may be nice to get rid of the >> freetype/fontconfig 219 dependencies if we can use the ones from >> xquartz - unless this is a bad idea for a reason I don't yet know. >> Looking into this. > > Freetype219 is still needed on Tiger. On Leopard, the X11-supplied > freetype2 is actually newer than Fink's and should be preferred. But > this would mean that you would need to make different packages for > 10.4 and 10.5. OTOH, solving the libGL problems might involve such a > distinction, too. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
